British darts player Andy Jenkins has found himself at the epicenter of a high-profile scandal related to suspicions of match manipulation. According to the Darts Regulation Authority (DRA), suspicious bets were recorded in 12 Modus Super Series games in which the athlete participated. Moreover, it became known that Jenkins himself made bets on his matches, which is strictly prohibited by the rules for active players.
The investigation was launched in July 2023, when the International Betting Integrity Association (IBIA) reported possible manipulation of the results of matches involving Jenkins. Suspicious bets attracted the attention of the DRA, which, together with the Gambling Commission, began an investigation. These actions led to the decision to initiate disciplinary proceedings. Andy Jenkins, who was 53 at the time of the investigation, is no stranger to the world of darts. He was one of the most successful players of his time, ranking in the top 10 in the world. In 2007, he reached the semi-finals of the World Championship, which was the peak of his career. However, recent events have overshadowed his achievements.
Read also: League of Legends and Valorant Are Already with Bookmakers.
From 15 November 2023, Jenkins has been provisionally suspended from competition under the auspices of the DRA. This means that he will not be able to participate in any professional tournament until the disciplinary proceedings are completed. It is expected that his case will be heard by a disciplinary committee in the near future, which will determine whether the darts player is guilty of breaking the rules. Match-fixing scandals undermine the trust of fans and sponsors in professional sports. In this case, we are talking about darts, a discipline that has attracted significant attention and investment in recent years. Such incidents can negatively affect the reputation of the sport and its future popularity.
Read also: Bookmakers Have Increased the Odds of Man City Being Relegated.
The darts community is divided. Some believe that Jenkins may have been a victim of circumstances or a flaw in the control system. Others believe that such an experienced player could not have been unaware of the rules and deliberately violated them. If Jenkins is found guilty, he could face serious consequences, including a lengthy suspension and significant fines. Such an outcome would not only end his career, but also serve as a warning to other athletes who are prone to breaking the rules.
The Jenkins case once again raises questions about the importance of transparency and fairness in sport. Organizations such as the DRA and IBIA continue to actively combat match-fixing in order to maintain trust in competitions and protect their participants.Casino and sportsbook partnerships – what’s next? Read gambling market insights. Find more on our site.
